トップページ > 記事閲覧

Dye Type & Protective Layer 日時： 2010/02/03 04:51 名前： CTMK Hi, I am from Malaysia, my Japanese language is not good enough to write a post so i use English to communicate here. Regarding the Dye Type for BD-R, which one is more long lasting? 相変化金属化合物 or 有機色素 ? I am using Pioneer DVD writer (DVR-112) at the moment and looking for a BD writer soon. I still considering because the writing surface for BD-R is still protected by 0.1mm of protective layer. is BD-R be easily accidentally destroyed by a simple scratch? Thanks for your time, I hope someone can read and reply this post :) By the way, this site is very helpful :) I no longer need to buy a few brand of discs and test them before deciding which to use. ありがとう！

Page: 1 |

Re: Dye Type & Protective Layer ( No.1 ) 日時： 2010/02/07 15:40 名前： 管理人(Webmaster)◆wnpTiu1eOoc Thank you for your post. >>Regarding the Dye Type for BD-R, which one is more long lasting? It is said LTH organic dye(有機色素) is not lasting long (though is not proven). Features of LTH type BD-R is "Short life, and low price" when saying without fearing the misunderstanding. But I never recommend LTH type BD-R for two reasons. The first reason is that "the qualities of them are simply bad". Another reason is a price. The advantage of LTH type BD-R is it can protect a manufacturer's investment in DVD-R/CD-R manufacturing equipment. However, the yield rate of LTH type BD-R is very worse, so manufacturers cannot lower the cost of discs. Therefore, "LTH has no advantage in the price at present". >> is BD-R be easily accidentally destroyed by a simple scratch? Any BD-R has scratch resistant surface. However, this is from necessary to protect weak protective layer. Moreover, because recording pitch of BD is shorter than DVD, a small scratch mark on the surface causes many error blocks. Therefore, we need to treat them carefully. sincerely, Re: Dye Type & Protective Laye ( No.2 ) 日時： 2010/03/13 22:27 名前： CTMK 参照： http://animemalaysia.com Thank you, and thanks for the information! (i don't know where to look for this information.) By the way, i am using Mitsubishi DVD+R at the moment. what do you think about the data life spend for 8x and 16x counterparts in general? (imo, i found that 16x disc have relatively more error then 8x disc. but depended on the batch number.) by the way, on my recent findings, one of my Mitsubishi DVD+R 8x (ZD-3596) already unable to be read by all of my drives. the disc is burned in around 2005. i remember it is burn in my lite on drive in full speed. Usually i burn my disc in half speed of the detected speed for better quality. those half speed burned disc lasts until now with slightly higher error rates in Nero CD-DVD Speed. Therefore to confirm with you, slower burnt disc have longer life then full speed burn? ーーーー Re: Dye Type & Protective Laye ( No.3 ) 日時： 2010/11/06 09:45 名前： シャンパン シャンパンっす！ 英語わかんねっす！(>_<)

Page: 1 |